
Chapter Twenty-Seven: Analysis of Views
Past existence and nonexistence,
A permanent world, and so forth --- These views depend On the extreme of the past. [27.1] The views of existence and nonexistence At a different time in the future, Of the end of the world, and so forth Depend on the extreme of the future. [27.2] Saying “It existed in the past” Indeed, does not make sense. Whatever occurred in past lives Is not the same as this. [27.3] If you think, “That itself is the self,” The appropriated would be different. Apart from appropriated, What is this self of yours? [27.4] When it is held that there is no self Apart from the appropriated, If the appropriated is itself the self, Your self does not exist. [27.5] The appropriated is not the self, For it arises and disintegrates. How could the appropriated Ever be the appropriator? [27.6] It does not make sense for there to be A self that is different from the appropriated. If different, it could reasonably be perceived In the absence of appropriation, yet it cannot. [27.7] Thus, it is not other than appropriation, Nor are these two the same. The self does not exist without appropriation, Yet neither can it be ascertained as nonexistent. [27.8] Saying “It did not exist in the past,” Does not make sense either. Whatever was there in past lives Is not different from this. [27.9] If it were something other, It could arise even in its absence. Likewise, that would remain And there could be birth without death there. [27.10] There would be annihilation, action would be wasted, The action done by one Would be experienced by another -- These and other flaws would ensue. [27.11] Something previously nonexistent does not arise Because flaws would follow: The self would be a product And its arising would lack a cause. [27.12] Thus, that the self existed, did not exist, That it both existed and did not, Or neither existed nor did not exist-- These views on the past are untenable. [27.13] The views that “it will exist At a different time in the future,” Or that, “it will not exist in the future,” Are equal to those about the past. [27.14] If the god were the human, It would be permanent. The god would be unborn, For the permanent has no birth. [27.15] If the god were different from the human, It would be impermanent. If the god and human were different, There could not reasonably be one stream of being. [27.16] If one part were divine And another part human, It would be permanent and impermanent. That is not reasonable either. [27.17] If permanent and impermanent Were both established, It would be possible to establish The neither permanent nor impermanent. [27.18] If something came somewhere from somewhere And then would go somewhere else, Then cyclic existence would have no beginning, Yet that is not the case. [27.19] When nothing is permanent, What could be impermanent? Permanence, impermanence, And both have been dismissed. [27.20] If the world had an end, How could there be another world? If the world had no end, How could there be another world? [27.21] This continuity of the aggregates Is just like an oil lamp’s light. Hence, neither finitude Nor infinitude makes sense. [27.22] If the previous were to cease, And if, based on these aggregates, Those aggregates would not arise, The world would have an end. [27.23] If the previous were not to cease, And if, based on these aggregates, Those aggregates would not arise, The world would be endless. [27.24] If one part were finite And another part infinite, The world would and would not have an end. This does not make sense either. [27.25] How could one part Of the appropriator be destroyed And another part not be destroyed? This does not make sense. [27.26] How could one part Of the appropriated be destroyed And another part not be destroyed? That does not make sense either. [27.27] If the finite and infinite Were both established, It would be possible to establish The neither finite nor infinite. [27.28] Alternately, because all things are empty, How could views of permanence and so on, Occur in any form, anywhere, And to anyone at all? [27.29] By the love of his heart, he accepts us And, so that all views may be relinquished, Reveals the sacred Dharma. To the teacher, Gautama, I prostrate. [27.30] <- Prev Dedication -> |
Internet Teaching | Prayer Book
|